This review of Berry's essays in the New York Times seems woefully unfair to me. The author is correct that Berry has often written on the same topics, which is a reason one doesn't really need every essay he's ever published. But the author fails to highlight some of the key themes that are so important, such as affection or what it takes to really build community.
Yes, Berry can sound like a crank at times, but I have found his an essential voice. I read both his essays and poetry, admiring the latter deeply while often feeling challenged by the former.
And, yes, he is "conservative" on many issues while being "progressive" on many others, meaning he doesn't fit well into our current political divides. I think he likes it that way. I believe this is part of his essential function, however. He is the rare voice trusted by folks across the spectrum who can speak words of challenge to them on some of their sacred cows.